|
Maternal
Efficiency: Limousin's Best Kept Secret
By Dr. Lauren Hyde
ENGLEWOOD, CO-When designing any profitable crossbreeding system, the first step
is to identify the component breeds whose characteristics best suit the
production environment and market target.
As a component on the terminal side, Limousin is unsurpassed in providing muscle
growth efficiency. Limousin-influenced calves lead the beef industry in feed
efficiency and red meat yield.
But what about the maternal side? Commercial produces typically discount the
maternal characteristics of Continental breeds, including Limousin, in favor of
British-based females. However, scientific evidence shows that Limousin females
are biologically efficient and flexible enough to be used under many
environmental conditions.
Results from the breed comparison study at Clay Center, Nebraska, show that
Limousin females are of moderate height and weight and produce medium-sized
calves with little calving difficulty (Table 1). In addition, the calves are
vigorous at birth with a high proportion surviving until weaning.
Limousin cows also have a long life span. Based on culling information collected
during NALF's Herd Total Inventory program, cows culled due to age were just
over 12 years old on average. In France, it is not uncommon for herds to have
cows in production at 15 to 17 years of age.
The NALF performance program has addressed cow longevity through its stayability
EPD. The stayability EPD is a tool for predicting genetic differences in the
likelihood of animals producing daughters that remain in production past age
six. The prolonged, favorable genetic trend in stayability (Figure 1) likely
results from years of culling open cows, fertility testing bulls, and requiring
heifers to calve first at two rather than three years of age. The trend also
shows that today's Limousin cattle are reproductively superior to their
foundation ancestors.
In the past, Limousin yearling heifers have been perceived to be late maturing
with low pregnancy rates after their first breeding season. To help improve age
at puberty, NALF introduced scrotal circumference EPDs in 1994. As with
stayability, scrotal circumference has shown an impressive genetic trend in the
past 10 years (Figure 2).
In 1999, NALF worked with researchers at Colorado State University to develop
prototype EPDs for heifer pregnancy, or the probability of a heifer conceiving
and remaining pregnant until time of palpation given she was exposed at
breeding. Results of this study showed that heritability of heifer pregnancy was
about .20. Because heifer pregnancy appears to be heritable in Limousin cattle,
this EPD could be used to genetically improve heifer fertility even further.
Milking ability is another trait in which Limousin females have gotten a bad
rap. However, optimum is the key word to use when discussing milking ability.
Problems are associated with both low and high levels of milk production. For
example, cows with extremely high levels of milk have higher maintenance
requirements, are harder to breed back on schedule, and may have a greater
incidence of teat and udder problems.
Results from the Clay Center breed comparison study show that Limousin females
produce intermediate levels of milk both 12 hours and 200 days following
parturition and surpass straightbred Angus in both categories. Nevertheless,
Limousin breeders have made great strides toward improving milking ability in
the last 10 years (Figure 2).
Then there is the temperament problem. Or is there? Genetic improvements in
docility have been substantial over the years (Figure 2), indicating that
breeders have aggressively culled animals with unacceptable dispositions. Nearly
85% of today's sires have a favorable docility EPD. These sires can be used in
the mating process to build replacements that are less likely to be culled due
to temperament problems. No other breed offers genetic information regarding
temperament, yet all breeds have lines of cattle with temperament problems.
Perhaps the most compelling evidence of the strengths of the Limousin female
stems from two studies designed to compare differences in efficiency among beef
breeds. When compared to Simmental, Hereford, and Brahman cows, Limousin females
ranked highest in the number of calves born per cow exposed and in the number of
calves weaned per cow exposed (Comerford et al., JAS 64:65-76, 1987).
At Clay Center (Jenkins and Ferrell, JAS 72:2787-2797, 1994), mature cows were
fed year round on one of four different levels of dry matter. Biological
efficiency was defined as grams of calf weaned per kilogram of dry matter intake
per cow exposed. At 3,500 and 7,000 kilograms of dry matter intake per cow per
year, which represented low and high levels of feed intake, Limousin cows ranked
second among six breeds in biological efficiency (Table 1). While British breeds
tended to be more efficient when feed was limited and Continentals more
efficient when feed intake was high, Limousin cows were highly efficient in
either case. These results suggest that Limousin females are more flexible than
females of other breeds, being able to adapt more readily to changing feed
resources in changing environmental conditions.
Limousin genetics offer value not only on the terminal but also on the maternal
side of a crossbreeding program. With their moderate size, long life span,
optimum level of milk production, and biological efficiency, Limousin-cross cows
are an excellent choice for commercial cattle producers under a wide variety of
market targets and production environments.
Limousin is the largest Continental breed registry in the United States.
Limousin is the leader in Muscle Growth Efficiency and is the ideal complement
to British cross cows. For more information, contact www.nalf.org.
|
Table 1. Breed Differences in Maternal
Efficiency Traits
|
|
Breed
|
Cow Weight
(lb)
|
Cow Hip Height
(in)
|
Calf Birth Weight (lb)
|
Calving Difficulty
(%)
|
12-hr Milk
Yield
(lb)
|
Biological Efficiency*
At 3,500
DMI
|
Biological Efficiency*
At 7,000
DMI
|
|
Limousin
|
1,213
|
52.4
|
86.4
|
15.7
|
10.2
|
33
|
42
|
|
Angus
|
1,094
|
49.6
|
74.7
|
8.8
|
9.3
|
39
|
17
|
|
Hereford
|
1,091
|
50.0
|
79.4
|
16.5
|
6.7
|
30
|
13
|
|
Gelbvieh
|
1,266
|
53.9
|
95.2
|
21.5
|
12.7
|
29
|
36
|
|
Simmental
|
1,272
|
54.3
|
94.2
|
23.9
|
13.1
|
26
|
42
|
|
Charolais
|
1,349
|
53.9
|
98.1
|
19.5
|
10.5
|
27
|
45
|
* Grams of calf weaned per kilogram of dry matter intake per cow exposed
Sources: USDA-ARS Technical Bulletin, 1999 and
Jenkins and Ferrell, JAS 72:2787, 1994

|